Home » Elections, News and Notes, Reconstruction, Uncategorized, congress, president

Post-Election Memos

22 November 2012 10 Comments

Now that the election has [thankfully] passed, I have compiled several short memos to the various groups that seemed to be at odds with
one another during the campaign.  Please feel free to read them all, but please also take special note of those that speak to a group with
which you identify.

To:  Democrats
Congratulations on the big win and the President’s triumphant return to the 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.  However, please note that Governor Romney and the Republicans were not “crushed”, “buried”, “blown away”, “soundly thrashed”, or any other metaphor for losing by a large margin.  You are the party that believes in math; since when does 2.4% represent a huge margin or landslide?  And before you say it, forget about the abomination called the Electoral College.  If ever there were election results that clearly pointed out the ability of the Electoral College to totally bastardize democracy, this was it.  Regardless, it is the hearts and minds of Americans that must be dealt with going forward, and those hearts and minds are virtually split – well at least the ones that actually voted.  Plus, the Republicans have a 40 seat lead in the House and a filibuster-able Senate.  In short, things are not substantively different than they were on Monday, November 5th.  As such, we are literally back to square one.  All we can do now is fervently pray that both sides are going to change their respective M.O.’s and begin working towards a compromise.  So please; let’s table the [undeserved] gloating – it’s divisive and destructive to the task at hand.  Plus, it proves that your party is just as willing to ignore math when it serves your purpose.

To:  Mainstream Republicans
OK, so you didn’t take back the White House.  I’m sure that stings a bit; but not all is lost.  You still have a 40 seat lead in the House and a filibuster-able Senate, so the President isn’t going to just have his way with you.  Plus, you did take several steps toward resting control of your party from the far right with the unseating of several, shall we say, less than intelligent (see Todd Akin) Congressmen.  I’m sure you won’t mind thanking the progressive groups who targeted them for ouster.  The question now is; will anything be different this go-around?  Will the Marco Rubio’s of your party win the day, insuring that absolutely nothing gets to a vote in the Senate, or will you reach across the aisle in search of compromise?   I’m not asking you to give up your principles, but there simply has to be a way for everyone to get something.  Please tell Marco to shut up and work to find it.

To:  Tea Partiers
You lost, now please go away.  That is all.

To: The Constitution, Green, Justice, Libertarian, and other third parties
Well, you gave it a shot; but don’t lose hope.  Actually, perhaps you should.  Together, you received less than 1.5% of the total popular vote; and considering that 90 million people didn’t even bother pulling a lever or punching a chad, that result is actually sadder than it looks.  90 million people didn’t care for President Obama or Governor Romney, and none of you couldn’t come up with a single candidate between you that they felt would be a better choice?  Ouch.  So, what did you guys and gals learn from this?  What you should have learned is that you are wasting your time and efforts.  Now I’m certainly no fan of the Big Two, but splintering farther to the left and/or right (some actually do both!) of the Republicans and Democrats is not what America wants.  OK, apparently 1.5% of Americans want it.  What y’all need to do is consider moving to the center.  When one of you takes that position, you might actually stand more than a snowballs chance in Hades.

To:  Folks that still believe social issues should be decided at the federal level
There’s this cool document called the Constitution of the United States.  Some call it the greatest document in history!  It provides us with a road map for navigating localized issues that tend to deeply divide Americans.  Take, for example, the definition of marriage.  According to the constitution, this matter should first be decided at the state level.  When 3/4 of the states agree, the US Constitution is amended and it becomes the law of the land; just as was done in 1964.  Thomas Jefferson called the 10th Amendment the cornerstone of the constitution for good reason.  They had just escaped a fascist dictatorship and they didn’t want that recreated over here. Of course, the federal government has been moving in that direction for the past 20 years.  Ever heard of the Patriot Act?  This is exactly the type of totalitarian legislation that Americans don’t want.  So until a time that there is a clear majority (75%) on any social issue, states should maintain the right of self-determination, just as happened en masse this election.  Democracy worked and we should be celebrating that — not looking for ways to force others to adopt our belief systems.

To:  The 90 Million Eligible Voters that Chose not to Participate in Democracy
While I am deeply saddened, I also feel your pain.  I have spoken with many of you non-voters since the election and have heard a variety of semi-valid reasons — and unfortunately, plenty of lame excuses.  So please understand that I am now addressing the former group.  Of the many given, there were two specific reasons that were most often offered.  First was the fact that your vote didn’t count.  Whether a Democrat in Texas or a Republican in New York, you knew before going to the polls that your vote [for president] would not make a single bit of difference in the outcome.  This is of course due to the very faulty system called the Electoral College that we desperately need to rid ourselves of; but that’s a topic for another memo.  The other (and by far most popular) motive for non-participation was a total dislike of the candidates and their platforms.  Decimated by the sustained barrage of negative, propaganda-filled ads liberally dished up by the two major combatants, you simply packed up and fled.  And like most refugees you are still looking for a home.  Well look no further.  Party Recon has raised its tent squarely in the political center, offering something for everyone; or at least everyone who isn’t looking to game the system in an attempt at enhancing personal power and wealth.   We have the plan for ridding our government of the liars and the buyers, and returning it to its rightful owners – The People.   Please visit us at www.partyrecon.org to learn more about who we are, the principles we stand for, and how we plan to break up the logjam created by Republicans and Democrats alike and get the country moving forward again.   If you are looking for a place to call your “political home”, please know that all are welcome here, and that we hope you will consider moving in soon.

10 Comments »

  • Post-Election Memos | The Middle Ground | Scoop.it said:

    [...] by Dan AronsonNow that the election has [thankfully] passed, I have compiled several short memos to the various groups that seemed to be at odds with one another during the campaign.To: DemocratsCongratulations on the big win and the President’s triumphant return to the 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. However, please note that Governor Romney and the Republicans were not “crushed”, “buried”, “blown away”, “soundly thrashed”, or any other metaphor for losing by a large margin. You are the party that believes in math; since when does 2.4% represent a huge margin or landslide? And before you say it, forget about the abomination called the Electoral College. If ever there were election results that clearly pointed out the ability of the Electoral College to totally bastardize democracy, this was it. Regardless, it is the hearts and minds of Americans that must be dealt with going forward, and those hearts and minds are virtually split – well at least the ones that actually voted. Plus, the Republicans have a 40 seat lead in the House and a filibuster-able Senate. In short, things are not substantively different than they were on Monday, November 5th… [MORE]  [...]

  • Ralph Kramden said:

    Obama’s margin was over 3%, not 2.4%.

  • Diane said:

    If I actually believed that one of your coffee party types was actually reasonable, I might have bought your BS, go back to your liberal “the world is my oyster” cause it makes me FEEL better, not because it makes constitutional sense. You all make me ill.

  • Reconparty (author) said:

    Thanks for the correction Ralph. I wrote the article before the final count was done. That said, do you see a significant difference between 2.4% and 3.x%? Did that make it make it a landslide or a shellacking? It really changes nothing in ours. The memo asks Democrats to work together with Republicans instead of gloating over them. To find common ground and solutions that are good for the entire country — or at least the majority. As of today, several prominent Republicans have extended the olive branch. Now the ball is in their court. Will the Democrats act in kind, or will thier reaction be, as you might say, “Bang! Zoom! Right in the kisser”? We’re hoping it’s the former.

  • Reconparty (author) said:

    Diane, first and foremost, please note that views stated here are those of Party Recon — not of the Coffee Party. They simply reprinted this post.

    That being said, I’m sorry you feel I’m being unreasonable and would like to better understand your reaction. I have not deluded myself into thinking the world is my oyster. Of course, unless you are a Fortune 500 CEO, Wall Street big-wig, or among the Top 1% of all earners, it’s not yours either. If you’re a true fan of the constitution, I’d think you’d want a government that lives up to the promise of said document. Do you really believe our current government, or that of the past 50 years has done this? Do you agree with the Supreme Court when they say that money is speech and that corporations and the rich should be able to dump limitless amounts into campaigning and lobbying in an attempt (usually successful) to buy influence? Please help us understand specifically what you are upset with so we can look for some common ground. I’ll bet we share quite a bit.

  • Post-Election Memos | Federal Politics | Scoop.it said:

    [...] by Dan AronsonNow that the election has thankfully passed, I have compiled several short memos to the various groups that seemed to be at odds with one another during the campaign.   [...]

  • Post-Election Memos | Party Recon | The Bottom Line | Scoop.it said:

    [...] by Dan Aronson — Now that the election has thankfully passed, I have compiled several short memos to the various groups that seemed to be at odds with one another during the campaign.  [...]

  • Reconparty (author) said:

    Glad you liked it Dima. It’s really all about putting the politics of self-interest aside and uniting for once. Then we can take it all back in the name of The People. That said, please drop me a line letting me know if there is a specific topic you wanted me to blog on. I’ll be happy to oblige.

  • 7WKup10 said:

    376117 166947BTW, and I hope we do not drag this too long, but care to remind us just what kind of weapons were being used on Kurds by Saddams army? Towards the tune of hundreds of thousands of dead Speak about re-written history 772930

  • Reconparty (author) said:

    Chemical weapons. Click here to read about just one such attack in which 3 to 5,000 people were killed ant 10,000 injured. There is no rewriting of history here.

Leave your response!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

* Copy this password:

* Type or paste password here:

26,352 Spam Comments Blocked so far by Spam Free Wordpress

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>